Shadeform primary logo

V100 vs RTX 4090

Explore a head to head comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing.

V100

The NVIDIA V100 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GPU ArchitectureVolta
Average Price$2.21/hr
GPU VRAM16 GB
Cloud Availability3 clouds
System Memory448 GB
CPU Cores92
Storage6.0 TB

RTX 4090

The NVIDIA RTX 4090 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GPU Architecture
Average Price$2.69/hr
GPU VRAM24 GB
Cloud Availability3 clouds
System Memory706 GB
CPU Cores120
Storage15.4 TB

V100 vs RTX 4090: Which Should You Choose?

The RTX 4090 offers 24 GB of VRAM — 1.5× the 16 GB on the V100 — making it better suited for large model workloads that require holding more parameters in GPU memory. On FP16 throughput, the RTX 4090 delivers 82.58 TFLOPS versus 28.26 TFLOPS on the V100 — 3× faster for mixed-precision training and inference. Memory bandwidth favors the V100 at 0.90 TB/s compared to 0.00 TB/s on the RTX 4090, which directly impacts inference latency for memory-bandwidth-bound models. Architecturally, the V100 is built on Volta while the RTX 4090 uses Ada Lovelace, reflecting different generational capabilities and optimizations. On Shadeform, the V100 starts from $0.39/hr versus $0.60/hr for the RTX 4090 — 54% more expensive — reflecting the performance premium.

V100 — Best Use Cases

  • Deep learning training
  • HPC and scientific computing
  • Legacy ML infrastructure

Choose V100 when:

  • 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for your workload
  • Cost efficiency is your primary concern
  • Your workload does not require peak FP16 throughput

RTX 4090 — Best Use Cases

  • LLM inference and model serving
  • Image generation and diffusion models
  • Smaller fine-tuning runs
  • Cost-efficient GPU compute

Choose RTX 4090 when:

  • You need 24 GB+ VRAM for large models or long context windows
  • Maximum performance justifies the higher cost
  • You are training large models or running high-throughput inference

See how the V100 & RTX 4090 compare

Compare detailed hardware specifications and average pricing for the V100 and RTX 4090.

Compare Hardware Specifications

V100RTX 4090
GPU Type
V100
RTX 4090
VRAM per GPU
16 GB
24 GB
Manufacturer
NVIDIA
NVIDIA
Architecture
Volta
Ada Lovelace
Interconnect
PCIe Gen3
PCIe Gen4
Memory Bandwidth
900 GB/s
1.008 TB/s
FP16 TFLOPS
28.26 TFLOPS (2:1)
82.58 TFLOPS (1:1)
CUDA Cores
5120
16384
Tensor Cores
640 (1st Gen)
512 (4th Gen)
RT Cores
N/A
128 (3rd Gen)
Base Clock
1230 MHz
2235 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
2520 MHz
TDP
250-300W
450W
Process Node
TSMC 12nm
TSMC 4N
Data Formats
FP16, FP32, FP64
FP8, INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32

Compare Average On-Demand Pricing

V100RTX 4090
1 GPU
$1.36 /hr
$0.60 /hr
2 GPUs
$0.78 /hr
$1.20 /hr
4 GPUs
N/A
$2.40 /hr
8 GPUs
$3.76 /hr
$3.97 /hr

Frequently Asked Questions: V100 vs RTX 4090

The main differences are VRAM (16 GB vs 24 GB), FP16 throughput (28.26 vs 82.58 TFLOPS), architecture (Volta vs Ada Lovelace). The V100 uses the Volta architecture while the RTX 4090 is based on Ada Lovelace, giving each GPU different generational capabilities.

The RTX 4090 is generally better for large language model training due to its higher throughput and 24 GB of VRAM, which allows fitting larger models or larger batch sizes in a single pass. For smaller models or fine-tuning tasks where cost matters more, both GPUs can be effective.

On Shadeform, the V100 is available from $0.39/hr. The RTX 4090 starts from $0.60/hr. Prices vary by provider, region, and contract length. Reserved commitments can reduce hourly costs significantly compared to on-demand pricing.

The RTX 4090 has more VRAM at 24 GB, compared to 16 GB on the V100. Higher VRAM allows you to run larger models without quantization, use longer context windows, and process larger batch sizes — all of which improve throughput and reduce latency for memory-bound workloads.

Based on TFLOPS per dollar, the RTX 4090 offers better raw compute value at current Shadeform on-demand rates. However, the best choice depends on your specific workload — if you need the extra VRAM or throughput of the V100, paying the premium may be justified by faster job completion and lower total cost.

The V100 is currently available across 3 cloud providers on Shadeform's network, compared to 3 for the RTX 4090. Shadeform lets you deploy either GPU across all available providers from a single platform, so you can always find available capacity without manually checking each cloud.

Mixing different GPU types in a single training cluster is generally not recommended, as it creates performance bottlenecks where faster GPUs wait for slower ones. For best results, use a homogeneous cluster of either V100 or RTX 4090. Shadeform supports on-demand clusters of up to 64 GPUs of the same type with no commitment required.

Explore V100 & RTX 4090 Instances

Browse available instances with V100 and RTX 4090 GPUs. Filter by provider, availability, and more to find the perfect instance for your needs.

Explore more GPU comparisons

Select any two GPUs to compare their specifications and explore pricing across providers.

Manage 30+ GPU clouds in one platform