A30 vs A40
Explore a head to head comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing.
A30
The NVIDIA A30 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.
A40
The NVIDIA A40 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.
A30 vs A40: Which Should You Choose?
The A40 offers 48 GB of VRAM — 2× the 24 GB on the A30 — making it better suited for large model workloads that require holding more parameters in GPU memory. On FP16 throughput, the A40 delivers 37.42 TFLOPS versus 10.32 TFLOPS on the A30 — 4× faster for mixed-precision training and inference. Memory bandwidth favors the A30 at 0.93 TB/s compared to 0.70 TB/s on the A40, which directly impacts inference latency for memory-bandwidth-bound models. On Shadeform, the A30 starts from $0.35/hr versus $1.10/hr for the A40 — 214% more expensive — reflecting the performance premium. The A40 is available across 2 cloud providers on Shadeform compared to 1 for the A30, giving more options for region and pricing flexibility.
A30 — Best Use Cases
- •General-purpose deep learning training
- •Fine-tuning models up to 13B parameters
- •AI inference at moderate throughput
- •Computer vision and NLP workloads
Choose A30 when:
- ✓24 GB VRAM is sufficient for your workload
- ✓Cost efficiency is your primary concern
- ✓Your workload does not require peak FP16 throughput
- ✓Your preferred provider already has availability
A40 — Best Use Cases
- •General-purpose deep learning training
- •Fine-tuning models up to 13B parameters
- •AI inference at moderate throughput
- •Computer vision and NLP workloads
Choose A40 when:
- ✓You need 48 GB+ VRAM for large models or long context windows
- ✓Maximum performance justifies the higher cost
- ✓You are training large models or running high-throughput inference
- ✓You need flexibility across multiple cloud providers or regions
See how the A30 & A40 compare
Compare detailed hardware specifications and average pricing for the A30 and A40.
Compare Hardware Specifications
| A30 | A40 | |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Type | A30 | A40 |
| VRAM per GPU | 24 GB | 48 GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Interconnect | PCIe Gen4 | PCIe Gen4 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 933 GB/s | 696 GB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 10.32 TFLOPS (1:1) | 37.42 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| CUDA Cores | 3584 | 10752 |
| Tensor Cores | 224 (3rd Gen) | 336 (3rd Gen) |
| RT Cores | N/A | 84 (2nd Gen) |
| Base Clock | 930 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1440 MHz | 1740 MHz |
| TDP | 165W | 300W |
| Process Node | TSMC 7nm | TSMC 8nm |
| Data Formats | INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32, FP64 | INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32 |
Compare Average On-Demand Pricing
| A30 | A40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 GPU | $0.35 /hr | $1.48 /hr |
| 2 GPUs | $0.70 /hr | $2.20 /hr |
| 4 GPUs | $1.40 /hr | $5.92 /hr |
| 8 GPUs | $2.80 /hr | $8.80 /hr |
Frequently Asked Questions: A30 vs A40
The main differences are VRAM (24 GB vs 48 GB), FP16 throughput (10.32 vs 37.42 TFLOPS).
The A40 is generally better for large language model training due to its higher throughput and 48 GB of VRAM, which allows fitting larger models or larger batch sizes in a single pass. For smaller models or fine-tuning tasks where cost matters more, both GPUs can be effective.
On Shadeform, the A30 is available from $0.35/hr. The A40 starts from $1.10/hr. Prices vary by provider, region, and contract length. Reserved commitments can reduce hourly costs significantly compared to on-demand pricing.
The A40 has more VRAM at 48 GB, compared to 24 GB on the A30. Higher VRAM allows you to run larger models without quantization, use longer context windows, and process larger batch sizes — all of which improve throughput and reduce latency for memory-bound workloads.
Based on TFLOPS per dollar, the A40 offers better raw compute value at current Shadeform on-demand rates. However, the best choice depends on your specific workload — if you need the extra VRAM or throughput of the A30, paying the premium may be justified by faster job completion and lower total cost.
The A40 is currently available across 2 cloud providers on Shadeform's network, compared to 1 for the A30. Shadeform lets you deploy either GPU across all available providers from a single platform, so you can always find available capacity without manually checking each cloud.
Mixing different GPU types in a single training cluster is generally not recommended, as it creates performance bottlenecks where faster GPUs wait for slower ones. For best results, use a homogeneous cluster of either A30 or A40. Shadeform supports on-demand clusters of up to 64 GPUs of the same type with no commitment required.
Explore A30 & A40 Instances
Browse available instances with A30 and A40 GPUs. Filter by provider, availability, and more to find the perfect instance for your needs.
Explore more GPU comparisons
Select any two GPUs to compare their specifications and explore pricing across providers.
