RTX 4000 Ada vs A30
Explore a head to head comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing.
RTX 4000 Ada
The NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.
A30
The NVIDIA A30 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.
RTX 4000 Ada vs A30: Which Should You Choose?
The A30 offers 24 GB of VRAM — 1.2× the 20 GB on the RTX 4000 Ada — making it better suited for large model workloads that require holding more parameters in GPU memory. On FP16 throughput, the RTX 4000 Ada delivers 26.73 TFLOPS versus 10.32 TFLOPS on the A30 — 3× faster for mixed-precision training and inference. Memory bandwidth favors the A30 at 0.93 TB/s compared to 0.36 TB/s on the RTX 4000 Ada, which directly impacts inference latency for memory-bandwidth-bound models. Architecturally, the RTX 4000 Ada is built on Ada Lovelace while the A30 uses Ampere, reflecting different generational capabilities and optimizations. On Shadeform, the A30 starts from $0.35/hr versus $0.79/hr for the RTX 4000 Ada — 126% more expensive — reflecting the performance premium.
RTX 4000 Ada — Best Use Cases
- •LLM inference and model serving
- •Image generation and diffusion models
- •Smaller fine-tuning runs
- •Cost-efficient GPU compute
Choose RTX 4000 Ada when:
- ✓20 GB VRAM is sufficient for your workload
- ✓Maximum performance justifies the higher cost
- ✓You are training large models or running high-throughput inference
A30 — Best Use Cases
- •General-purpose deep learning training
- •Fine-tuning models up to 13B parameters
- •AI inference at moderate throughput
- •Computer vision and NLP workloads
Choose A30 when:
- ✓You need 24 GB+ VRAM for large models or long context windows
- ✓Cost efficiency is your primary concern
- ✓Your workload does not require peak FP16 throughput
See how the RTX 4000 Ada & A30 compare
Compare detailed hardware specifications and average pricing for the RTX 4000 Ada and A30.
Compare Hardware Specifications
| RTX 4000 Ada | A30 | |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Type | RTX 4000 Ada | A30 |
| VRAM per GPU | 20 GB | 24 GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Ampere |
| Interconnect | PCIe Gen4 | PCIe Gen4 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 360 GB/s | 933 GB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 26.73 TFLOPS (1:1) | 10.32 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| CUDA Cores | 6144 | 3584 |
| Tensor Cores | 192 (4th Gen) | 224 (3rd Gen) |
| RT Cores | 48 (3rd Gen) | N/A |
| Base Clock | 1500 MHz | 930 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 2175 MHz | 1440 MHz |
| TDP | 130W | 165W |
| Process Node | TSMC 4N | TSMC 7nm |
| Data Formats | FP8, INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32 | INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32, FP64 |
Compare Average On-Demand Pricing
| RTX 4000 Ada | A30 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 GPU | $0.79 /hr | $0.35 /hr |
| 2 GPUs | N/A | $0.70 /hr |
| 4 GPUs | N/A | $1.40 /hr |
| 8 GPUs | N/A | $2.80 /hr |
Frequently Asked Questions: RTX 4000 Ada vs A30
The main differences are VRAM (20 GB vs 24 GB), FP16 throughput (26.73 vs 10.32 TFLOPS), architecture (Ada Lovelace vs Ampere). The RTX 4000 Ada uses the Ada Lovelace architecture while the A30 is based on Ampere, giving each GPU different generational capabilities.
The RTX 4000 Ada is generally better for large language model training due to its higher throughput and 20 GB of VRAM, which allows fitting larger models or larger batch sizes in a single pass. For smaller models or fine-tuning tasks where cost matters more, both GPUs can be effective.
On Shadeform, the A30 is available from $0.35/hr. The RTX 4000 Ada starts from $0.79/hr. Prices vary by provider, region, and contract length. Reserved commitments can reduce hourly costs significantly compared to on-demand pricing.
The A30 has more VRAM at 24 GB, compared to 20 GB on the RTX 4000 Ada. Higher VRAM allows you to run larger models without quantization, use longer context windows, and process larger batch sizes — all of which improve throughput and reduce latency for memory-bound workloads.
Based on TFLOPS per dollar, the RTX 4000 Ada offers better raw compute value at current Shadeform on-demand rates. However, the best choice depends on your specific workload — if you need the extra VRAM or throughput of the A30, paying the premium may be justified by faster job completion and lower total cost.
The RTX 4000 Ada is currently available across 1 cloud providers on Shadeform's network, compared to 1 for the A30. Shadeform lets you deploy either GPU across all available providers from a single platform, so you can always find available capacity without manually checking each cloud.
Mixing different GPU types in a single training cluster is generally not recommended, as it creates performance bottlenecks where faster GPUs wait for slower ones. For best results, use a homogeneous cluster of either RTX 4000 Ada or A30. Shadeform supports on-demand clusters of up to 64 GPUs of the same type with no commitment required.
Explore RTX 4000 Ada & A30 Instances
Browse available instances with RTX 4000 Ada and A30 GPUs. Filter by provider, availability, and more to find the perfect instance for your needs.
Explore more GPU comparisons
Select any two GPUs to compare their specifications and explore pricing across providers.
