A100 vs A100
Explore a head to head comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing.
A100
The NVIDIA A100 is a powerful Ampere-based GPU designed for AI training, inference, and high-performance computing workloads.
A100
The NVIDIA A100 is a powerful Ampere-based GPU designed for AI training, inference, and high-performance computing workloads.
A100 vs A100: Which Should You Choose?
Both the A100 and A100 offer 40 GB of VRAM, putting them on equal footing for memory-bound workloads.
A100 — Best Use Cases
- •General-purpose deep learning training
- •Fine-tuning models up to 13B parameters
- •AI inference at moderate throughput
- •Computer vision and NLP workloads
Choose A100 when:
- ✓The A100 fits your infrastructure and budget
A100 — Best Use Cases
- •General-purpose deep learning training
- •Fine-tuning models up to 13B parameters
- •AI inference at moderate throughput
- •Computer vision and NLP workloads
Choose A100 when:
- ✓The A100 fits your infrastructure and budget
See how the A100 & A100 compare
Compare detailed hardware specifications and average pricing for the A100 and A100.
Compare Hardware Specifications
| A100 | A100 | |
|---|---|---|
| GPU Type | A100 | A100 |
| VRAM per GPU | 40 GB | 40 GB |
| Manufacturer | NVIDIA | NVIDIA |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Interconnect | PCIe Gen4 or SXM4 | PCIe Gen4 or SXM4 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 1.55 TB/s | 1.55 TB/s |
| FP16 TFLOPS | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) | 77.97 TFLOPS (4:1) |
| CUDA Cores | 6912 | 6912 |
| Tensor Cores | 432 (3rd Gen) | 432 (3rd Gen) |
| Base Clock | 765 MHz | 765 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1410 MHz | 1410 MHz |
| TDP | 250W-400W | 250W-400W |
| Process Node | TSMC 7nm | TSMC 7nm |
| Data Formats | INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32, FP64 | INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32, FP64 |
Compare Average On-Demand Pricing
| A100 | A100 | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 GPU | $1.88 /hr | $1.88 /hr |
| 2 GPUs | $4.38 /hr | $4.38 /hr |
| 4 GPUs | $8.64 /hr | $8.64 /hr |
| 8 GPUs | $14.90 /hr | $14.90 /hr |
Frequently Asked Questions: A100 vs A100
The A100 and A100 have different specifications and performance characteristics suited to different workloads. Use the spec comparison table above for a detailed breakdown.
The A100 is generally better for large language model training due to its higher throughput and 40 GB of VRAM, which allows fitting larger models or larger batch sizes in a single pass. For smaller models or fine-tuning tasks where cost matters more, both GPUs can be effective.
On Shadeform, the A100 is available from $1.36/hr. The A100 starts from $1.36/hr. Prices vary by provider, region, and contract length. Reserved commitments can reduce hourly costs significantly compared to on-demand pricing.
Based on TFLOPS per dollar, the A100 offers better raw compute value at current Shadeform on-demand rates. However, the best choice depends on your specific workload — if you need the extra VRAM or throughput of the A100, paying the premium may be justified by faster job completion and lower total cost.
The A100 is currently available across 5 cloud providers on Shadeform's network, compared to 5 for the A100. Shadeform lets you deploy either GPU across all available providers from a single platform, so you can always find available capacity without manually checking each cloud.
Mixing different GPU types in a single training cluster is generally not recommended, as it creates performance bottlenecks where faster GPUs wait for slower ones. For best results, use a homogeneous cluster of either A100 or A100. Shadeform supports on-demand clusters of up to 64 GPUs of the same type with no commitment required.
Explore A100 & A100 Instances
Browse available instances with A100 and A100 GPUs. Filter by provider, availability, and more to find the perfect instance for your needs.
Explore more GPU comparisons
Select any two GPUs to compare their specifications and explore pricing across providers.