Shadeform primary logo

A40 vs V100

Explore a head to head comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing.

A40

The NVIDIA A40 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GPU Architecture
Average Price$4.30/hr
GPU VRAM48 GB
Cloud Availability2 clouds
System Memory480 GB
CPU Cores96
Storage7.8 TB

V100

The NVIDIA V100 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GPU ArchitectureVolta
Average Price$2.59/hr
GPU VRAM16 GB
Cloud Availability3 clouds
System Memory448 GB
CPU Cores92
Storage6.0 TB

A40 vs V100: Which Should You Choose?

The A40 offers 48 GB of VRAM — 3× the 16 GB on the V100 — making it better suited for large model workloads that require holding more parameters in GPU memory. On FP16 throughput, the A40 delivers 37.42 TFLOPS versus 28.26 TFLOPS on the V100 — 1.3× faster for mixed-precision training and inference. Memory bandwidth favors the V100 at 0.90 TB/s compared to 0.70 TB/s on the A40, which directly impacts inference latency for memory-bandwidth-bound models. Architecturally, the A40 is built on Ampere while the V100 uses Volta, reflecting different generational capabilities and optimizations. On Shadeform, the V100 starts from $0.39/hr versus $1.10/hr for the A40 — 182% more expensive — reflecting the performance premium. The V100 is available across 3 cloud providers on Shadeform compared to 2 for the A40, giving more options for region and pricing flexibility.

A40 — Best Use Cases

  • General-purpose deep learning training
  • Fine-tuning models up to 13B parameters
  • AI inference at moderate throughput
  • Computer vision and NLP workloads

Choose A40 when:

  • You need 48 GB+ VRAM for large models or long context windows
  • Maximum performance justifies the higher cost
  • You are training large models or running high-throughput inference
  • Your preferred provider already has availability

V100 — Best Use Cases

  • Deep learning training
  • HPC and scientific computing
  • Legacy ML infrastructure

Choose V100 when:

  • 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for your workload
  • Cost efficiency is your primary concern
  • Your workload does not require peak FP16 throughput
  • You need flexibility across multiple cloud providers or regions

See how the A40 & V100 compare

Compare detailed hardware specifications and average pricing for the A40 and V100.

Compare Hardware Specifications

A40V100
GPU Type
A40
V100
VRAM per GPU
48 GB
16 GB
Manufacturer
NVIDIA
NVIDIA
Architecture
Ampere
Volta
Interconnect
PCIe Gen4
PCIe Gen3
Memory Bandwidth
696 GB/s
900 GB/s
FP16 TFLOPS
37.42 TFLOPS (1:1)
28.26 TFLOPS (2:1)
CUDA Cores
10752
5120
Tensor Cores
336 (3rd Gen)
640 (1st Gen)
RT Cores
84 (2nd Gen)
N/A
Base Clock
1125 MHz
1230 MHz
Boost Clock
1740 MHz
1380 MHz
TDP
300W
250-300W
Process Node
TSMC 8nm
TSMC 12nm
Data Formats
INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32
FP16, FP32, FP64

Compare Average On-Demand Pricing

A40V100
1 GPU
$1.48 /hr
$1.36 /hr
2 GPUs
$2.20 /hr
$0.78 /hr
4 GPUs
$5.92 /hr
N/A
8 GPUs
$8.80 /hr
$4.72 /hr

Frequently Asked Questions: A40 vs V100

The main differences are VRAM (48 GB vs 16 GB), FP16 throughput (37.42 vs 28.26 TFLOPS), architecture (Ampere vs Volta). The A40 uses the Ampere architecture while the V100 is based on Volta, giving each GPU different generational capabilities.

The A40 is generally better for large language model training due to its higher throughput and 48 GB of VRAM, which allows fitting larger models or larger batch sizes in a single pass. For smaller models or fine-tuning tasks where cost matters more, both GPUs can be effective.

On Shadeform, the V100 is available from $0.39/hr. The A40 starts from $1.10/hr. Prices vary by provider, region, and contract length. Reserved commitments can reduce hourly costs significantly compared to on-demand pricing.

The A40 has more VRAM at 48 GB, compared to 16 GB on the V100. Higher VRAM allows you to run larger models without quantization, use longer context windows, and process larger batch sizes — all of which improve throughput and reduce latency for memory-bound workloads.

Based on TFLOPS per dollar, the V100 offers better raw compute value at current Shadeform on-demand rates. However, the best choice depends on your specific workload — if you need the extra VRAM or throughput of the A40, paying the premium may be justified by faster job completion and lower total cost.

The V100 is currently available across 3 cloud providers on Shadeform's network, compared to 2 for the A40. Shadeform lets you deploy either GPU across all available providers from a single platform, so you can always find available capacity without manually checking each cloud.

Mixing different GPU types in a single training cluster is generally not recommended, as it creates performance bottlenecks where faster GPUs wait for slower ones. For best results, use a homogeneous cluster of either A40 or V100. Shadeform supports on-demand clusters of up to 64 GPUs of the same type with no commitment required.

Explore A40 & V100 Instances

Browse available instances with A40 and V100 GPUs. Filter by provider, availability, and more to find the perfect instance for your needs.

Explore more GPU comparisons

Select any two GPUs to compare their specifications and explore pricing across providers.

Manage 30+ GPU clouds in one platform