Shadeform primary logo

V100 vs B200

Explore a head to head comparison of specifications, performance, and pricing.

V100

The NVIDIA V100 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GPU ArchitectureVolta
Average Price$2.21/hr
GPU VRAM16 GB
Cloud Availability3 clouds
System Memory448 GB
CPU Cores92
Storage6.0 TB

B200

The NVIDIA B200 delivers high-performance computing capabilities for AI, machine learning, and data science applications.

ManufacturerNVIDIA
GPU Architecture
Average Price$21.98/hr
GPU VRAM192 GB
Cloud Availability4 clouds
System Memory2900 GB
CPU Cores248
Storage30.7 TB

V100 vs B200: Which Should You Choose?

The B200 offers 192 GB of VRAM — 12× the 16 GB on the V100 — making it better suited for large model workloads that require holding more parameters in GPU memory. On FP16 throughput, the V100 delivers 28.26 TFLOPS versus 1 TFLOPS on the B200 — 28× faster for mixed-precision training and inference. Memory bandwidth favors the V100 at 0.90 TB/s compared to 0.01 TB/s on the B200, which directly impacts inference latency for memory-bandwidth-bound models. Architecturally, the V100 is built on Volta while the B200 uses Blackwell, reflecting different generational capabilities and optimizations. On Shadeform, the V100 starts from $0.39/hr versus $5.29/hr for the B200 — 1256% more expensive — reflecting the performance premium. The B200 is available across 4 cloud providers on Shadeform compared to 3 for the V100, giving more options for region and pricing flexibility.

V100 — Best Use Cases

  • Deep learning training
  • HPC and scientific computing
  • Legacy ML infrastructure

Choose V100 when:

  • 16 GB VRAM is sufficient for your workload
  • Cost efficiency is your primary concern
  • You are training large models or running high-throughput inference
  • Your preferred provider already has availability

B200 — Best Use Cases

  • Next-generation LLM pre-training at scale
  • Trillion-parameter model inference
  • Ultra-high-throughput AI workloads
  • Advanced HPC and scientific computing

Choose B200 when:

  • You need 192 GB+ VRAM for large models or long context windows
  • Maximum performance justifies the higher cost
  • Your workload does not require peak FP16 throughput
  • You need flexibility across multiple cloud providers or regions

See how the V100 & B200 compare

Compare detailed hardware specifications and average pricing for the V100 and B200.

Compare Hardware Specifications

V100B200
GPU Type
V100
B200
VRAM per GPU
16 GB
192 GB
Manufacturer
NVIDIA
NVIDIA
Architecture
Volta
Blackwell
Interconnect
PCIe Gen3
SXM6
Memory Bandwidth
900 GB/s
8 TB/s
FP16 TFLOPS
28.26 TFLOPS (2:1)
1,191.2 TFLOPS (16:1)
CUDA Cores
5120
20480
Tensor Cores
640 (1st Gen)
640 (5th Gen)
Base Clock
1230 MHz
700 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1965 MHz
TDP
250-300W
1000W
Process Node
TSMC 12nm
TSMC 4NP
Data Formats
FP16, FP32, FP64
FP4, FP6, FP8, INT8, BF16, FP16, TF32, FP32, FP64

Compare Average On-Demand Pricing

V100B200
1 GPU
$1.36 /hr
$5.29 /hr
2 GPUs
$0.78 /hr
$10.49 /hr
4 GPUs
N/A
$20.78 /hr
8 GPUs
$3.76 /hr
$36.68 /hr

Frequently Asked Questions: V100 vs B200

The main differences are VRAM (16 GB vs 192 GB), FP16 throughput (28.26 vs 1 TFLOPS), architecture (Volta vs Blackwell). The V100 uses the Volta architecture while the B200 is based on Blackwell, giving each GPU different generational capabilities.

The V100 is generally better for large language model training due to its higher throughput and 16 GB of VRAM, which allows fitting larger models or larger batch sizes in a single pass. For smaller models or fine-tuning tasks where cost matters more, both GPUs can be effective.

On Shadeform, the V100 is available from $0.39/hr. The B200 starts from $5.29/hr. Prices vary by provider, region, and contract length. Reserved commitments can reduce hourly costs significantly compared to on-demand pricing.

The B200 has more VRAM at 192 GB, compared to 16 GB on the V100. Higher VRAM allows you to run larger models without quantization, use longer context windows, and process larger batch sizes — all of which improve throughput and reduce latency for memory-bound workloads.

Based on TFLOPS per dollar, the V100 offers better raw compute value at current Shadeform on-demand rates. However, the best choice depends on your specific workload — if you need the extra VRAM or throughput of the B200, paying the premium may be justified by faster job completion and lower total cost.

The B200 is currently available across 4 cloud providers on Shadeform's network, compared to 3 for the V100. Shadeform lets you deploy either GPU across all available providers from a single platform, so you can always find available capacity without manually checking each cloud.

Mixing different GPU types in a single training cluster is generally not recommended, as it creates performance bottlenecks where faster GPUs wait for slower ones. For best results, use a homogeneous cluster of either V100 or B200. Shadeform supports on-demand clusters of up to 64 GPUs of the same type with no commitment required.

Explore V100 & B200 Instances

Browse available instances with V100 and B200 GPUs. Filter by provider, availability, and more to find the perfect instance for your needs.

Explore more GPU comparisons

Select any two GPUs to compare their specifications and explore pricing across providers.

Manage 30+ GPU clouds in one platform